HARPINE - JERRY'S OBSERVATIONS
|
|
When motorcar enthusiasts approach a collector
automobile for potential purchase, attend a car show or have
a serendipitous encounter the experience is enhanced when an
owner declares their example to be an original. Knowing the mechanical
creature before us has all the attributes straight from the primary
manufacture becomes a welcoming site. Far too often automobiles
obtain personal touches that alter the true carriage created
by the many engineers, artisans and workers striving to shape
the end vision of a designer. The opportunity to view and understand
the representation of a true specimen preserves the historical
significance for us and others with whom we might share the viewing.
Nothing is wrong with the personalized versions making up the
majority of automobiles. These non-radical modifications maintain
the intent of the primary vision and yet provide some increase
in performance or pure occupant comfort. For decades there have
been magazines/books, catalogs filled with plug and play options
and clubs with creative and experienced members addressing typical
adjustments. When does an original become altered to the point
that one can no longer claim the configuration to be a native
original? Clearly, street rods and kit cars are examples of a
vehicles transformation to non-original status. Are there more
subtle examples where alterations occurred to the point that
one can no longer claim the configuration to be of native origin? |
|
In recent decades many terms have become
frequent verbiage in the universe of automobiles. Hot Rod, customization,
personalization, Rat Rod, authentic, original, barn find. replica,
look-a-like, tribute, tooled example, race prepared, re-bodied,
reconstruction, restoration and some that memory fails me or
I have never heard the term. The setting here is to clarify the
original versus the impersonator concept. One may impersonate
a famous person but you can't legally go get a driver's license
under their name or buy a house using their name or make any
claim to being the real person because it is fraud. If one decides
to replicate the celebrities hairstyle, clothing, and mannerisms
they may fool many and the impersonator may even get a free drink
or dinner in the process. Very little harm done. If one goes
a step further and starts booking performances under the celebrities
name that is called fraud and an impending legal proceeding will
probably follow. Claiming originality in faux paintings, antiquities
and primitive artifacts with technically exquisite craftsmanship
has been occurring for centuries for prestige and financial gain.
Again, it is fraudulent and if caught it may result in legal
actions. |
|
Throughout our auto industry there are
those that have perpetrated many a scam for financial gain. In
the realm of collector cars and more specifically with Sunbeam
Tigers many have attempted to replicate the Jensen factory's
production of the famous Carol Shelby/Ken Miles/Norman Garrad
Sunbeam V8 creation. Unfortunately, there are a few enthusiasts
that have been prey to those raptors who don't disclose the non-original
status of their fake creation. To protect such atrocities Norm
Miller and others established the Tiger Authentication Committee
(TAC). It is a sad state of affairs that a small portion of humankind
necessitates such a protectorate to be developed. The standard
for TAC is simple, the claimed Tiger must have the original VIN
plate and all of a Tiger's primary manufacture's telling attributes
present in ordered to be certified an original. The composition
of a VIN plated Sunbeam Alpine body with components, original
or not used in a Tiger (engine. transmission, rack-n-pinion,
etc) does not constitute an original Sunbeam Tiger. |
|
Rather it has been named an Algers (Alpine
Tiger). Fortunately, most all Alger owners/creators have integrity
and damonstrate intelligence to avoid legal proceedings by being
forthright about the true status of their fabrication. Unfortunately,
the automobile collector hobby still encounters a few unscrupulous
Algers owners claiming they have an original Tiger. Some have
even attempted to solidify their claim to the point of attaching
an original Tiger VIN plate. Having a personalized Tiger is more
common than not. However, these individualized versions were
all bom from the primary manufacture and are thus considered
personalized originals. I have never met a personalized Tiger
owner that, without, hesitation shared the implementation of
personal touches to their Tiger. In fact, they are proud, as
they should be. |
|
The Rootes Group choose the Harrington
Ltd, a coach factory of longstanding, to transform a Sunbeam
Alpine into a Harrington. Read the History section at Harrington
Alpine.org to gain appreciation about the short run of these
unique and beautiful creations. Having an opportunity to view
any model of Harrington often becomes a moment where a viewer
claims, "I have never seen one of these before." With
few in existence and even fewer on the road or in restoration
mode the Harringtons have become prestigious and economically
valuable. Just like Tigers, Harringtons utilized a Sunbeam Alpine
platform and some have taken on personalization qualities. And
just like Algers Sunbeam Alpines may also be morphed into Harrpines
(Harrington Alpines). All that is needed are some of the original
or reproduced Harrington components attached to a significantly
altered Sunbeam Alpine body. As an example, if one has a Harrington
with a rusted out body requiring significant work to bring it
back to roadworthy condition it will never become a running original
without such efforts. Instead it could become a re-bodied Harrpine
using the Harrington components on a Sunbeam Alpine donor car.
Thus, an impersonator is created. If the VIN plate were transferred
to the new body it would be subject to all laws regarding fraud.
Yes, the re-bodied Harrpine has the facade of a Harrington, but
it isn't a paragon original made at the Harrington Ltd factory
legally displaying the original VIN plate. There are examples
of Harrpines in circulation or being worked on claiming originality
by their owners. Rather than a TAC system to monitor these unscrupulous
owners we have to rely on the Harrpine craftsman to be forthright
about constructing a re-body Harrpine. |
|
 |